淘汰赛阶段，瑞士队的防守特质展现得淋漓尽致，1/16决赛2比0零封阿尔及利亚，1/8决赛对阵哥伦比亚，双方鏖战120分钟互交白卷，最终瑞士在点球大战中4比3胜出，时隔72年重返世界杯八强，追平队史最佳战绩。

萧志仁当选2026怡宝中乙联赛5月最佳守门员

78939 ★

摘要：其中维蒂尼亚和内维斯身价均高达1.4亿欧元，两人组成的中场双枢纽，攻守兼备，技术与硬度并存。

过去十年，这笔＂卖碳＂收入撑起了特斯拉利润表的半壁江山，本季它仍占经营利润的47.6%；把它拿走，经营利润只剩下4.84亿美元。

1、欧宝首页尤文面临主力中卫布雷默可能离队的局面，土耳其豪门加拉塔萨雷开出高薪邀约，迫使斑马军团提前物色替代者，AC米兰的托莫里进入考察名单。

但3D 打印的传播链条更长，一个模型从被看见到被打印，还要经过尺寸、结构、耗材、时间、装配和用途的判断。欧宝首页埃斯图皮尼安的转会是目前进展最快的一笔交易。

2、上海警方严厉打击违法代拍演唱会门票加价倒卖等行为

合规与内控漏洞方面，旭阳新材及其子公司收到了来自海关、统计局、税务局、应急管理局等多个部门的行政处罚。

3、恺英网络旗下《原始传奇2》顺利取得版号

通过持续举办菁英跑系列活动，FILA传递了明确的产品理念：不在专业跑鞋红海追逐碳板竞速，而是开辟“商务跑鞋”新品类。

4、金价银价油价全线下跌

首战摩洛哥首发，次战海地踢了约40分钟因腿筋伤退场。

5、特朗普：越南战争有20万美军死亡，对伊朗战争仅18名美军死亡，“美国在对抗伊朗方面进展很顺利，好得超乎任何人想象”

按42.80元/股的转让价计算，成交价基本与IPO发行价持平，上市四年，公司累计扣非净利润不足5000万元，实控人一笔交易就能套现超10亿元。

依托该平台，本届大赛将深度链接区域创新资源，升级本土创新平台服务能力，深化与本土初创及新兴科技企业的协同创新，为参赛项目提供更完善的孵化生态与落地保障。

市场价摆在那，不给够人早就跑了。

6、HWG！昔日曼联顶级新星24岁去土耳其“挣大钱”，场外因素是阻力

自 2021 年 6 月加盟法兰克福以来，克勒舍帮助球队赢得了欧联杯冠军，两次打进欧冠联赛，并且在转会市场上展现出了惊人的眼光。

而他的搭档迈克尔·奥利塞，则用两次助攻将自己的单届世界杯助攻数提升至7次，打破了贝利保持的单届6助的纪录，将世界杯历史单届助攻王收入囊中。

7、高血压滴酒不能沾？医生怒斥：若忍不住喝酒，可逃不开这3个危害

" 周日的决赛中，尽管拥有历史最佳球员梅西，阿根廷却未能对组织严密、更具攻击性的西班牙制造实质性威胁。

数据显示，滔博年末总卖场面积同比下降9.7%，但单店面积反而上升了3.9%。

8、中乙综述丨第1轮

此项计划同时也充分考量了欧足联的相关规章。

2018年2月5日，波动率突然飙升。

壁仞科技推出支持单个超节点1024卡扩展的NPO光互连方案。

9、莫让爱心“冷藏”，请把物资及时送到真正需要的人手中

伯里的启示不是让所有人寻找下一场危机，而是明白真正可持续的凸性投资，必须同时找到事实、时间和投资工具。

葡萄牙球员向来以技术细腻、战术执行力强著称，这与沙特联赛追求快速提升竞技水平的需求高度契合。

10、爆冷成功！哈兰德双响内马尔泪别国家队挪威2比1巴西进8强

但多头情绪仅维持了不到48小时。

相对而言，产业端对行业景气度更为乐观。

1、阿尔瓦雷斯加时绝杀瑞士：1.5亿身价正名，阿根廷挺进四强

简单来说，DNA合成服务就是“按需定制基因片段”的工厂。

2、绝经后，夫妻生活或出现“难言之隐”，原因有2个，男女都该知道

更不用说还有泸溪河、鲍师傅、绝味、煌上煌、蜜雪冰城等跨界品牌入局新鲜零食赛道，以产品矩阵互补的方式搭配售卖，增强消费者购物体验；以美团快乐猴、盒马超盒算NB为代表的社区平价超市、以小象超市、朴朴超市为代表的前置仓玩家也在加码短保鲜食SKU，凭借着更大的分量和更低的单价抢占家庭消费场景。

3、高温又要返场？本周先雨后热！最高气温36℃

那些在凌晨三点、清晨六点爬起来看球的日子，总算告一段落。7月24日重要公告：苏试试验上半年净利润同比增长10.37%球迷们的反应呈现出两极分化的态势，但失望与嘲讽的声音尤为刺耳。

4、建龙集团龙新矿业招聘

在许玮看来，“这是一个超千亿的市场，用存储扩展显存，本质不是为了和谁竞争，更多的是希望让每一块钱的算力投资产出更多Token，让每一家中小企业和开发者都用得起大模型。

5、“湘超”湘潭队誓师出征

本届世界杯，姆巴佩本是赛场上最耀眼的明星之一。

6、普联软件筹划控制权变更事项旗下股票及可转债将于7月27日起停牌_网易订阅

" 凭借在英超效力的经历，麦卡利斯特对英格兰足球再熟悉不过。

国金证券的判断或许最为中肯：黄金下有配置价值，上需事件催化。

原本格林布什矿山就处于全球硬岩锂矿成本曲线最底端，扩产后的规模优势，将进一步拉大与同行的成本差距。

7、真要买？法国第一边锋“只想去皇马”，拜仁开价2亿穆帅会满足么

莫德里奇在米兰对阵尤文图斯的比赛中与洛卡特利猛烈相撞后受伤，导致左侧颧骨骨折，目前克罗地亚人已经成功完成手术，但将缺席赛季剩余比赛。

英格兰拿走了季军奖杯和60年来的最佳成绩；姆巴佩和奥利塞则带走了金靴和助攻王的历史级荣誉。

8、四次申请加映！《给阿嬷的情书》又斩获一项冠军

不过，考虑到此次事件发生在世界杯半决赛，且对手是英格兰，性质更为严重，罚款的金额可能会高于2014年的标准。

这并非礼来第一次在阿尔茨海默病领域折戟，但却动摇了礼来高层在CNS领域继续聚焦的决心。

从“澡盆之约”到世界杯决赛，这不仅是拉玛西亚青训营的传承，更是足球世界最极致的浪漫与宿命，梅西和亚马尔都是从巴萨19号到10号，并逐步成为红蓝军团的真核。

真蓝黑CEO佩尔卡西的一番话也意有所指：“我与他有着非凡的关系，我非常清楚他近年来在这里所取得的成就。

孔德：亚马尔言论并非不尊重，只是他表达自信的方式意媒丨纽卡和考文垂都对托莫里感兴趣伊姐周日热推：电视剧《看得见风景的窗》；电视剧《春日狂热》...... 王宝山当选2026怡宝中乙联赛6月最佳教练员

关联文章推荐

加载更多

网站提醒和声明

欧宝首页更关键的是，他在防守端的进步同样扎实，八次抢断和两次拦截的数据，恰好印证了巴埃纳所说的他在无球状态下对球队的帮助。申请删除>> 纠错>> 投诉侵权>> 平台自有内容（文字、图片、界面、榜单、商标、LOGO 等）知识产权归本站所有，未经书面许可，禁止复制、转载、商用。

提交说明：快速提交发布>> 查看提交帮助>> 注册登录>>

赞 90847

踩 88869

最新评论

用户评论60384

请先登录后再发表评论发布

历史第4！27岁姆巴佩8场轰10球4助攻！成盖德穆勒后世界足坛首人

85647

资金从当期利润和现金流转向厂房、设备、产能与基础设施，相关折旧、研发和供应链成本会在收入形成前先进入报表。[2026]

世界波不过瘾，卖烤肉赚大钱，华丽转身的波多尔斯基当球队老板了

58474

Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场，变身硅谷投资人。

法国大战西班牙！世界杯半决赛对阵前瞻：最强的矛VS最硬的盾！

92376

巴西隐患集中在边路，两名主力边后卫年龄偏大，面对日本灵活的边路冲击存在防守漏洞，且球队面对密集防守时攻坚效率有待提升。

山东拟立法规定：电子烟等新烟草制品参照传统卷烟监管

99273

对于新一代魔彩盒平台的产品，客户测试过程出乎意料地顺利，因为这是一次比较大的技术变化，一开始我们也比较谨慎，但客户测试完成后的反馈非常积极。

酸奶被关注！医生发现：喝得越多，肌少症老年人肌肉流失或越慢？

28797

对西班牙而言，打平即可稳获出线权且大概率锁定小组第一，即便输球也有很大概率晋级，战术选择十分灵活。

湘潭市民间林长开展鸟类保护“清网行动”

37348

因此投资凸性有两个铁律：单次损失必须小，大收益出现之前，必须有能力重复尝试。

岁月难掩锋芒：2026世界杯过人榜梅西28次第1，亚马尔第2，C罗0次

75473

现年54岁的齐达内，终于在本月与法国足协正式签约，正式顶替德尚，接过“高卢雄鸡”的教鞭。

九年重回福地！李昊桐再战伯克戴尔 2026英国公开赛爱奇艺体育全程直播

96393

但现实却是一记响亮的耳光。

在尤文皇马混不开，在中小球队放得开，生不逢时还是实力使然？

50113

面对强队时会主动收缩防线，形成5-4-1的密集防守阵型，放弃控球权专注于防守韧性。

上千枚导弹，要飞向伊朗？

19711

加载更多